Beware of the man whose extraordinary claims end in a sales pitch.

— R.A.Delmonico

Bring the mind and the phenomena will follow.

— R.A.Delmonico

Character trumps circumstance every time.

— R.A.Delmonico

Debates should always move in the direction of understanding.

— R.A.Delmonico

Emergent behaviors rely on computational geometry and scale.

— R.A.Delmonico

Even if a particle could travel backward in time, information could not. Retrocausality will be replaced by something more sophisticated. There are no perfect symmetries, there is no pure randomness everything is an approximation of something else. Information may appear in a digital form but meaning never does. Spacetime is built up from approximations, not discrete ones and zeros, and the only constant may be ratios. Quantum entanglement and geometry; if we think of a particle as being at one pole of an expanding sphere that is not perfectly symmetrical, this surface would be "rippling" like the surface of the ocean (in the audio world this is called dithering), at the other pole is the entangled particle's pair, and it is a property of the sphere that gives the illusion of connectivity. This is not a physical geometry, it is a computational geometry. Is spacetime a product of entanglement? Renate Loll believes that time is not perfectly symmetrical. Her computer models require causality. Possibly some form of quantum random walk in state space. If a photon is emitted by an electron inside a clock on Earth, and it travels to a clock four light years away, time stops for the clock on Earth and time jumps forward eight years for the distant clock also, the electron that will capture the photon becomes infinitely large relative to the photon but the electron that emitted it does not become infinitely small therefore, time is not perfectly symmetrical.

— R.A.Delmonico

Everything is fields, and a particle is just a smaller version of a field. There is a harmonic relationship involved. Disturbing ideas like those of Einstein in 1905 and Feynman Pocono Conference in 1948. Here we go;1) The universe is ringing like a bell. Neil Turk's Public Lecture: The Astonishing Simplicity of Everything.2) The stuff of the universe is waves or fields.3) Scale is relative, not fixed because all of these waves are ratios of one another.4) The geometry is fractal. This could be physical or computational.5) If the geometry is computational then, there is no point in speaking about the relationship of the pixels on the display.

— R.A.Delmonico

Handling power is very much like handling explosives, you have to have a great deal of respect for it and most people don't.

— R.A.Delmonico

Have you been called to greatness? There is a way to tell. Do you have a pulse?

— R.A.Delmonico

Heart is really just forgetting to fail.

— R.A.Delmonico